ODM has been cautioned against a slow slide into its own undoing after Victor Marende told party members that constant internal disorder could gradually weaken a movement that once commanded national attention.
In politics, strength is often lost quietly, not loudly, so the warning raises a simple question, how long can a party survive if it becomes its own biggest obstacle
While ODM has been known for mobilising protests and defending public interest, Marende suggested that the same energy should now shift toward planning, building alliances, and setting a long-term national course.
The link above shows how he urged leaders to move away from defaulting to street action every time a disagreement arises.
In his view, supporters need protection from conflict-driven politics, especially at a time when many are struggling with economic uncertainty and fatigue from repeated public disruptions.
He described party influence as something that must be guarded carefully rather than spent recklessly.
Across the political landscape, Kenyans have grown more sensitive to internal fights. Parties that once appeared solid are now learning that unity cannot be assumed.
Internal rivalry, unclear communication, and mixed messages slowly push away loyal supporters who expect clarity, direction, and growth.
ODM, after decades of shaping national debate, now faces a moment where self-reflection may matter more than rally chants.
Marende’s remarks were not framed as disapproval but as an alert. He seemed to suggest that opposition is important, yet it must be strategic rather than habitual.
A strong voice in national affairs needs order, renewed purpose, and the discipline to choose battles wisely, not constantly.
Whether ODM takes this caution seriously or brushes it aside will determine not just its standing in elections, but also its ability to remain a relevant force in shaping Kenya’s political future.
Tags
Politics