Through a detailed post on his official X account, Muturi faulted the government for what he described as an “authoritarian drift,” claiming the law is designed to intimidate citizens who question those in power.
He argued that the amendments disguise themselves as protection against digital offenses while serving as instruments of political control.
Muturi condemned the new law as an assault on Kenya’s constitutional freedoms, warning that it would erode public confidence in democratic governance.
“This law is not about cybercriminals; it is about fear. It punishes courage and rewards silence,” he wrote.
His remarks have amplified growing unease across the country, with rights groups, lawyers, and journalists accusing the government of attempting to police public opinion.
Critics argue that the law’s vague definitions of “false” or “misleading” information give authorities excessive power to target dissenters and suppress free expression online.
Civil society organizations have also warned that the legislation could be used selectively against activists, bloggers, and political opponents.
The debate now echoes beyond social media, as ordinary citizens question whether the government is committed to safeguarding democratic principles or merely tightening its grip on power.
Muturi’s sharp criticism adds a powerful voice to the chorus demanding that the law be revisited.
Tags
Politics