In his remarks, Thuku claimed that teachers who visited State House were allocated KSh100 million, while a delegation of pastors reportedly received KSh80 million.
He further alleged that Members of County Assembly (MCAs) also left the presidency with KSh100 million, arguing that the money came from public resources funded by taxpayers.
According to Thuku, such spending raises serious concerns about the government's priorities at a time when many Kenyans continue to face economic hardship.
He argued that whoever supplied information to Ruto during that earlier period is likely the same individual now feeding intelligence to both Raila Odinga and Gachagua.
Thuku suggested this same source could continue supplying future political figures who find themselves in similar underdog positions.
According to Thuku, informers generally do not remain loyal to a single individual, choosing instead to share information with whoever they believe will make it public.
He explained that the trust involved has less to do with protecting the informer and more with confidence that the details will actually be published.
Thuku's remarks point to a long standing pattern of leaks within government structures that appears to persist regardless of who holds power.
He suggested that understanding this pattern matters more than focusing on any single political era or administration.
The claims add to ongoing speculation about the sources behind various political leaks that have affected different administrations over the years. Reactions online have been mixed, with some finding the theory plausible while others questioned the absence of concrete evidence.
Neither State House nor Gachagua has responded to Thuku's claims. The conversation continues to generate interest as more Kenyans reflect on the pattern he described.
Tags
Kenya