His comments have ignited fierce debate across the political divide, with supporters and critics rushing online to either defend or condemn his assessment.
During the discussion, Mutua questioned the presidential suitability of Trans Nzoia Governor George Natembeya, arguing that the governor's public image does not project the qualities expected of a Head of State.
Mutua further turned his attention to Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna, suggesting that the youthful politician may be allowing growing public praise to cloud his political judgment.
He argued that while Sifuna has undeniable potential and should continue building his political career, he still requires many more years of experience before he can be seriously considered for the country's highest office.
The remarks immediately sparked an avalanche of reactions online, exposing the deep political divisions surrounding Kenya's opposition leadership.
A section of Kenyans fiercely defended Natembeya and Sifuna, accusing Mutua of unfairly attacking leaders they believe represent the future of the country's politics.
Others questioned Mutua's credibility and relevance, arguing that his political commentary should not be treated as the ultimate measure of leadership.
However, another group maintained that Mutua was merely expressing his personal political assessment and that public figures should expect scrutiny in a democratic society.
The debate has once again highlighted the growing contest over who is best positioned to shape Kenya's political future as conversations surrounding the 2027 General Election continue to gather momentum.
Tags
Politics