In a statement shared on social media, Havi questioned how the entire Court of Appeal could issue a decision on the wrong application in a high-profile case.
The controversy centers on Civil Appeal No. 656 of 2022, involving the National Social Security Fund Board of Trustees against the Kenya Tea Growers Association and 14 others.
According to court documents highlighted by Havi, the ruling referenced incorrect procedural details, including dates and applications that did not match the actual filings before the judges.
He noted that the court seemed to have relied on an application dated in one period while addressing submissions from another, raising questions about the thoroughness of the review process.
The former LSK leader described the situation as unacceptable at the appellate level, where precision and accuracy are essential for maintaining public confidence in the judiciary.
In his message, Havi emphasized that such mistakes undermine the integrity of the judicial system.
He called on Chief Justice Koome to either exercise firm leadership over her judges or consider stepping aside if she cannot address these issues effectively.
Legal observers have noted that procedural errors in superior courts can lead to delays, increased costs for litigants, and perceptions of inefficiency.
Havi's remarks have sparked discussions on social media about accountability within Kenya's highest judicial offices.
As of now, there has been no official response from the Chief Justice's office or the Court of Appeal regarding the claims.
The case highlights ongoing debates about standards in judicial decision-making and the need for robust internal mechanisms to catch and correct errors before judgments are delivered.
Tags
People