Fresh questions are emerging within the opposition's Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP) over the relationship between party leader Rigathi Gachagua and his deputy, Cleophas Malala, following the latter's repeated absence from key party activities.
In recent weeks, Gachagua has increasingly relied on John Methu as his chief political lieutenant, fueling speculation that the centre of power within DCP may be shifting.
The debate intensified after Methu was elevated to the position of acting secretary-general, replacing Hezron Obaga in a major party reshuffle.
The appointment was widely interpreted as a sign of growing confidence in the Nyandarua senator, who has become one of Gachagua's most visible and vocal allies.
Observers have noted that Malala has been missing from several high-profile DCP events and rallies where he previously featured prominently alongside Gachagua.
His absence from strategic party meetings earlier this year sparked widespread speculation about his standing within the party hierarchy.
While Gachagua previously dismissed reports of a fallout, insisting that Malala had temporarily stepped back due to health concerns, questions have persisted as Methu's influence continues to grow.
Political analysts argue that optics matter in politics. As Gachagua tours the country and addresses supporters, Methu is increasingly the leader standing beside him, issuing party statements and spearheading key assignments.
The latest indication of Methu's growing stature came when he was tasked with leading DCP's campaign efforts in the upcoming Ol Kalou by-election.
The assignment is viewed as a major test of his political machinery and ability to deliver electoral victories for the party.
Ironically, Malala himself recently defended Methu's appointment and stated that the senator would earn permanent confirmation as secretary-general if he successfully delivers the by-election win.
However, he also hinted that failure could see the arrangement reviewed.
The remarks have been interpreted in different ways. Some see them as evidence that Malala remains influential within the party.
Others believe they reflect an underlying struggle over who controls DCP's future direction.
Reports from within DCP suggest disagreements over party strategy, candidate selection and leadership decisions.
Recent media reports have pointed to growing tensions over unilateral decision-making and concerns among some leaders about inclusivity in party affairs.
Although neither Gachagua nor Malala has publicly acknowledged a rift, the continued prominence of Methu and the prolonged absence of Malala have kept speculation alive.
For now, DCP leaders maintain that the party remains united. Yet in politics, perception often becomes reality.
As Gachagua continues to speak through Methu while Malala remains largely out of the spotlight, questions about the party's internal balance of power are unlikely to disappear anytime soon.
Tags
Politics